![]() |
Going Mobile FriendlyBelow are some points to consider for mobile compliance if you are planning to build a new website or are updating an existing site.View Long Version |
Aspect |
Responsive |
Mobile Version |
How they work |
Responds by shrinking or expanding to fit computers and mobile devices. Read more... |
Includes two websites, one specifically for mobile. Read more... |
Little known facts |
In essence creates two websites in the same webpage. |
Mobile version does include responsive code. |
Mobile friendliness |
Yes, but slower to load. |
Mobile version is compliant. |
Is it responsive? |
Yes. |
Mobile version usually is. |
Loading speed |
Includes extra code in each webpage. |
Designed specifically for speed. |
SEO |
Good for SEO. Passes the Google Mobile-Friendly Test. |
Good for SEO. May do slightly better in searches. Mobile version passes the Google Mobile-Friendly Test. |
Ease of use |
Not design friendly for the casual user. |
Two separate websites must be maintained. |
Limitations |
Allows for less applications, products, page text, large tables and interactive elements. |
Top level site allows for creative freedom. Mobile version will be more restricting. |
User experience |
Can be a less rich user experience due to limitations. |
Creates a more customized version of each site allowing for a better user experience. |
Real world |
Small business webmasters may not want to learn the code needed for this type of design. |
Two websites are more difficult to keep updated. |
Updating old sites |
Code works on any website no matter how old it is. Can be complicated. |
Allows older sites to be updated without disturbing the current site. |
Building new sites |
Good choice for simple websites. |
Good choice to better target mobile and/or desktop users. |
Domain |
Only a single domain is needed. |
Can be in a folder or on its own domain. |
Goals |
Best if the business targets desktop and mobile visitors equally. |
Best choice for creative freedom. |
Future considerations |
Due to how responsive works there may need to be updates. |
Detection may need to be updated. Mobile version can be made the top level site at any time. |
When to use |
For new websites that do not have a lot of information on each page. |
For complex sites or to target specific devices. |
Conclusion |
More complicated to work with, slower loading speeds, more design limitations. Excellent choice for webmasters looking to learn responsive design and users that plan a more simple website. Good for SEO. |
Need to maintain two websites. Allows more creative freedom. Best choice for webmaster that would like to target desktop and mobile individually. Has a slight edge over RWD for SEO in most, but not all cases. |
Web Template Solutions | ||
Aspect |
Responsive |
Mobile Version |